Re: sqr Vs crystal

[Keith Zielinski <kzielinski@RA.ROCKWELL.COM>]

We have PS Financials also(7.0/7.5). SQR Vs Crystal is really an open ended
question to me. I have used both and each has its benefits depending on
your system. SQR's are better particularly if you have large volumes to
process but, creating a crystal report is fairly quick depending on the
complexity of the report and can run acceptably fast for smaller volumes of
data.  Crystals are typically easier to modify than SQR's. A rule of thumb
that we use is and that PeopleSoft recommends is use Crystal first, then
SQR's if necessary because of the quicker editing time associated with most
Crystal reports. For what it is worth, our main processes are SQR's and the
reports are about half and half SQR/Crystal.




"McCoy, Ken D (INPO)" <McCoyKD@INPO.ORG> on 13-10-98 08:52:59 AM

Please respond to SQR-USERS@USA.NET

To:   Multiple recipients of list SQR-USERS <SQR-USERS@list.iex.net>
cc:    (bcc: Keith Zielinski/Milwaukee/RA/Rockwell)
Subject:  Re: sqr vs crystal




Having worked in both SQR is my choice by far.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Satnam Sanghera [SMTP:satnamssanghera@YAHOO.COM]
> Sent: Tuesday, October 13, 1998 9:38 AM
> To:   Multiple recipients of list SQR-USERS
> Subject:      sqr vs crystal
>
> Hi everyone,
> We are in the process of implementing peoplsoft financials. Our
> interfaces are ready and now a very interesting question has come up -
>
> For custom reports what criteria should we use to determine if it is
> advisable to build the reports in sqr or crystal. Any feedback will be
> appreciated.
>         Thanks in advance.
> Satnam
> (310) 380-5109
>
>
>
>
> _________________________________________________________
> DO YOU YAHOO!?
> Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com