The other element, is the [ Y 2000 10 6 :STANDRD_LTR_TBL.ADMIN_FUNCTION] if the "Y" is changed to "N" then the size of the storage increases at least by 50% approximately.
Question? Considering that this one table
could require 4-8 gigs all by itself, per year for ccltrgen.sqr viewable
records, is any other institution having experiences like this. The answer
to the situation could be handled in many ways. However, wondering if the
efficiency of the whole process isn't a bit wasteful taking up all of this
disk space.
As there are considerable fields which hold white
space. Perhaps the big question is how important is it to have viewable
history of history of letters and fields used to generate letters, if the
business need is high, then disk space must be allocated. This type of
table growth is quite significant and cannot be overlooked during planning
and allocation of system resources. Thus the interest in bringing this
into the public eye. Any work around, suggestions, solutions greatly appreciated.
begin:vcard n:Oltmanns;Larry x-mozilla-html:TRUE org: adr: version:2.1 email;internet:skyway@mn.uswest.net title:Consultant fn:Larry Oltmanns end:vcard