Re: NT Scheduler vs. VMS license

["Campbell, Andrew" <acampbell@UNITEDMEDIA.COM>]

Fellow VMSer:

Yes I have wrtten a nuber of batch processes that run lockbox, posting
and journalling for Financials. Using UCX the processes can even send
E-mail. As far as licensing we have both the Server side (VMS) and
client (NT/95) which should be the norm.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: C. Duncan Hudson [SMTP:c_duncan_hudson@YAHOO.COM]
> Sent: Wednesday, June 24, 1998 8:38 AM
> To:   Multiple recipients of list SQR-USERS
> Subject:      NT Scheduler vs. VMS license
>
> Anyone have any experience running SQR under VMS?  Are there any major
> differences?  Can code migrate smoothly from the NT environment to the
> VMS environment?
>
> The reason I'm asking is that we are in the process of writing a great
> deal of SQR interfaces between Oracle Financials and an NT maintenace
> system.  We don't currently have a means of scheduling the interfaces
> in NT.  We are looking at several NT schedulers (Appworx, etc.), but
> it suddenly occurred to me that it might be easier just to run the
> jobs in VMS and leverage our existing batch scheduling utilities.
> Does anyone have any thoughts / ideas?  Does anyone know what the
> licensing is for SQR on VMS?  Thanks in advance,
>
> Dunc.
>
>
>
>
> _________________________________________________________
> DO YOU YAHOO!?
> Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com