Re: PeopleSoft Opportunities

[Alan Dalton <adalton@SIERRASYS.COM>]

We've been through this argument before.  I'd really prefer we not
revisit it.  And,  Chris,  lighten up...

> ----------
> From:         Wanko, Christopher[SMTP:cwanko@GRENET.ATT.COM]
> Sent:         Tuesday, February 03, 1998 9:06 AM
> To:   Multiple recipients of list SQR-USERS
> Subject:      Re: PeopleSoft Opportunities
>
> >Lighten up!
>
> Uh-huh.  Great way to make me wanna get on your side of the argument.
>
> >Ms. Henderson's e-mail was clearly identified by its' title as a
> recruiting
> >message and could have simply been deleted.  It was done
> professionally.
> >The message queue is not filling up with constant job opportunities.
>
> Three things.
> I can identify SPAM easily by its title, but no one would argue its
> relevancy.
>
> It wasn't done 'professionally', because professionals understand that
> user forums to exchange practical implementations of software aren't
> appropriate venues for advertisements.  If we want ads, we buy slick
> magazines.
>
> The message queue may not be filling up for you, but some of us have
> more email than most and would rather keep it to the relevant business
> necessities.  If you like nonsense in your mailbox, subscribe to the
> Tool list.
>
> It might be more work to argue pro/con on the issue, but I'm not going
> to be dissuaded by such a weak premise as "easy opposed to right".
>
> -Chris
>