[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Author Index]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[SQR-USERS Info]
[SQRUG Home Page]
No Subject
>From mike Tue Apr 18 08:20:30 0600 1995 remote from ascadm1.adams.edu
Date: Tue, 18 Apr 1995 08:20:30 -0600 (MDT)
From: Mike Henry <mike@ascadm1.adams.edu>
Subject: Re: Porting SQR to UNIX
To: sqr-users@usa.net
In-Reply-To: <950417212542_76543.2321_BHT140-1@CompuServe.COM>
Message-ID: <Pine.3.89.9504180841.A12389-0100000@ascadm1.adams.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: from ascadm1.adams.edu by ascadm1.adams.edu; Tue, 18 Apr 1995 08:20 MDT
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Length: 1625
Howard,
As far as getting your data to the Novell Network I use a FTP server
on the Novell server (HellSoft Shareware). I then run bftp on
our UNIX machine that schedules file transfers between machines.
This FTPD NLM is available on the internet.
This seems to work fine.
One nice thing about the FTP on NOVELL is that I run one deamon(NLM)
on server and that gives me FTP access to all servers.
Mike Henry
Adams State College
Alamosa CO 81102
(719)589-7796
mike@ascadm1.adams.edu
On Mon, 17 Apr 1995, Howard Nelson wrote:
> Thank you for ALL your comments.
>
> I have thought about using a control table to trigger the report as some have
> suggested, but I am also trying to investigate other possibilities.
>
> I have been considering the feasability of using WINSOCK. I have found a few
> products that access winsock through a very simple API, so I could have status
> and control sent back to the client instead of having to log everything from
> UNIX and then rely on the client to get it back.
>
> Has anyone had any experience doing something similar to this?
>
> Another consideration for me is that we have to copy the output from the UNIX
> box to the Novell network, so when the report is finished the client must
> initiate a file transfer. I know there are various means of doing that, by
> using a FTP bundled with a TCP/IP product, but our marketplace is such that we
> dont want to be tied to a particular product like that, and WINSOCK is vendor
> independant. Anyone doing something similar?
>
> Thanks again for the help, any more comments would be appreciated.
>
> Howard Nelson
>
>