[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Author Index]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[SQR-USERS Info]
[SQRUG Home Page]
Re: [sqr-users] Optimizer goal
- Subject: Re: [sqr-users] Optimizer goal
- From: "George Jansen" <GJANSEN@aflcio.org>
- Date: Fri, 02 Jun 2006 10:46:03 -0400
- Delivery-date: Fri, 02 Jun 2006 10:48:52 -0400
- List-id: "This list is for discussion about the SQR database reportinglanguage from Hyperion Solutions." <sqr-users.sqrug.org>
If no ORDER BY is provided on the SELECT, I can imagine that the change of
optimizer settings could cause the rows to be delivered in a different order.
What is the database setting if you run "show pararameter optimizer_mode" from
the SQL*Plus prompt? But though a change in optimizer mode could affect the
order of rows delivered, in the absence of an ORDER BY that enforces strict
ordering, it should not affect the rowset otherwise.
The B flag would be -B1000, not B-1000.
>>> Ganesh.Muralidhar@honeywell.com 06/02/06 9:03 AM >>>
1) When I used the
Alter Session set Optimizer_goal = CHOOSE before all the SQL statements
in my reporting SQR the report data changed completely. Can any one give
the reason for this.
2) when I used the
Begin-select B-1000
EMPLID,
...
....
It gives a compilation error . Oracle 9i is the database for the
peoplesoft. What is the reason
Regards
Ganesh A.M
_______________________________________________
sqr-users mailing list
sqr-users@sqrug.org
http://www.sqrug.org/mailman/listinfo/sqr-users
_______________________________________________
sqr-users mailing list
sqr-users@sqrug.org
http://www.sqrug.org/mailman/listinfo/sqr-users